3 weeks
x
81 Views

Daddy bought a 32′ boat when I was in fifth grade, he took his buddies on day trips salmon fishing. I loved catching salmon and reeled in two by myself when I was ten. Momma talked Daddy into taking me out for my 11th birthday. I didn’t know it was going to be two nights, we waited at the dock for buddies he said were going with us. Then we shoved off without them when they didn’t show. We were out 10 miles looking for tuna when we heard on the CB they were an hour south of us. We got down there and caught two, daddy wanted to stay all night so we went closer to shore where we had enough anchor rope. We cooked supper while sipping wine so I was feeling good after eating some tuna. Daddy showered first and stepped out n@ked then I went into the shower. When I got out I was enamored by Daddies n@ked body so I stepped out n@ked acting like I couldn’t find my towel. Daddy dried me off with his towel lingering on my p&ssy and B00bs. We Drank more wine laying on the bed n***, I watched his thing grow when he pulled me closer for a hug. I instinctively grabbed and jacked it. Daddy said it’s all yours for tonight and closed his eyes, I thought he went to sleep. I straddled him he didn’t move. I humped his h@rd0n till I came the just laid there for a while with it pressed between my lips. I was feeling good from the wine still so I decided to see how far it would go inside me. It took me about 25 minutes to get used to it going inside me. I was working it deeper when Daddy arched his back then pulled me to him tightly. He pulled it in so deep it wouldn’t go any more. I felt the sp1rts going inside me so I had another 0rgasm. I thought Daddy’s 5″s was huge at the time, we stayed the second night but didn’t fish much since we kept going back to bed. I could take the whole thing by the time we we docked on the third day. I felt guilty so I said to mom “I did it with Daddy” expecting to be punished, she said “Please don’t tell me about it. I was a h0rny girl at your age too. When my Momma was to tired she sent daddy to my room.”.

New Confession

Related Confessions

America and POTUS 45 waged war on the world from 2019, without telling anyone. For context, Moderna was working with DARPA in 2012 under project codename ‘ADEPT: PROTECT’ to develop COVID vaccines—a full seven years before the pandemic – and this is the result, so far in just America: MIT Scientist Drops Bombshell Evidence Linking Covid ‘Vaccines’ to Global Mass Deaths Surge
Frank BergmanMay 23, 2025 – 12:57 pm
A world-renowned data expert has dropped explosive new evidence confirming the link between Covid mRNA “vaccines” and global mass deaths.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) computer scientist Dr. Steve Kirsch, the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF), used advanced artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to identify the cause of surging global excess deaths.
Kirsch, the inventor of the optical computer mouse, used the algorithms to produce an all-cause mortality analysis method.
This novel, simple method proves that Covid mRNA “vaccines” killed far more people than they saved, Kirsch revealed.
During an interview on the Alex Jones Show, Kirsch explained that his analysis shows that the “safe and effective vaccine” narrative is false.
Instead, he said Covid mRNA injections have killed millions of people around the world.
Kirsch noted that pharmaceutical companies are “killing people” with their “vaccines.”
He argued that Big Pharma executives should not “get a pass” when it comes to criminal charges.
“You can’t just look away like that when people are telling you that your product is murdering people,” he noted.
“That is indefensible.”
Kirsch referenced his data while responding to the explosive Senate hearing on Covid “vaccine” safety that has been taking place this week.
Several leading experts have testified about the unprecedented harms caused by the mass “vaccination” campaign.”
He noted that Democrat Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) produced charts during the hearing showing “how many lives that the Covid virus had killed.”
“And the second chart behind [Blumenthal] is ‘How many lives the Covid vaccines have saved.’
“This is like blatant propaganda that is completely false,” Kirsch declared.
“It’s very shameful.”
“The guy needs to be brought up on charges at Nuremberg 2.0,” Jones added about Blumenthal.
WATCH:
MIT Scientist Drops Bombshell Evidence Linking Covid ‘Vaccines’ to Global Mass Deaths Surge
Kirsch also noted that Blumenthal is “not acknowledging the vaccine harms, or that it’s caused any deaths at all.”
Jones added that the senator is a “certified fraud.”
Later in the interview, Jones explained:
“We’ve got government numbers out of Europe, government numbers out of New Zealand,” showing surging all-cause deaths and injury among young people.
“Then we see overall mortality worldwide exploding – This isn’t even like a signal, this is the Ten Commandments written in stone,” he added.
Kirsch noted that his method proves these death surges are caused by Covid injections.
He notes that his method can also be used to prove that “vaccines cause autism.”
Kirsch published his “super simple, amazingly powerful method” on his Substack:
You pick a start of study date (e.g., when 70% of your population (which you divide up into same age groups, e.g., born in 1950-54) has been vaxxed) which defines who is in the intervention vs. control groups. Next, your look for a time period after the start date when no external stress relative to the intervention is present, e.g., the 3 months just after June 1 in the Czech Republic when there was no COVID). You start cumulating event counts at that point in each cohort to establish a relative baseline rate in the two groups while under normal external stresses.
This start date for cumulation will ideally be as close to the start date as possible, e.g., the same as the study start date.
Now all you do is plot the Ratio of (c** intervention events) / (c** control events) on the y-axis vs. time and look at the slope. The observation time period should include times when the external stress is applied so our two counters reflect the differential outcome response in the two cohorts. The slope of a line drawn between the cumulative ratio at the start of observation time till the end of observation time (typically 1 year later but could be any time period of interest where the external common mode stress is “supposed to” produce a differential outcome count, i.e., ACM deaths per week lowered in the vaxxed v. unvaxxed) tells the story of benefit or harm:
Slope up—> vaccine is clearly killing people. Flat slope —> no change. Slope down —> net mortality benefit.
There are two caveats to be aware of if you are dealing with a vaccine intervention *AND* your outcome is DEATH:
If there is a healthy vaccinee effect (HVE) observed in the two raw event count lines vs. time (it appears like merging traffic lanes that are later parallel and is very obvious), you must start count accumulation when the lanes have been merged. Below is what it would look like if present (it isn’t present in our dataset since most people were vaxxed way before the start point). Typically, you’d only see this in real life if you are looking at time series data where the deaths are relative to the time of the shot. See these Medicare time series death plots for the COVID vaccine showing the effect is gone 30 days post shot and is exponentially declining in impact (deaths rise quickly at t=0, slower as t increases and you’re at actual mortality by t=30 days or earlier). The slopes post that time are due to seasonality impacts (look at ALL the graphs and you’ll see that), not “long term HVE” which there is no such thing. See also the Pneumococcal vaccine curve (Medicare 2021 all ages) showing the HVE effect is gone in ~14 days.
If there is a non-negligible absolute negative slope in the control group, you need to subtract that slope from the answer which will alway reduce the harm or increase the benefit. This adjusts for the depletion effect in the unvaccinate cohort which behaves (mortality wise) like a group of people 10 years older than the age group you are looking at. So it always applies to cohorts of age 75 or older due to the depletion effect (older people’s absolute weekly mortality becomes comparable or greater than their annual increase in baseline mortality).
“That’s it!!! Simple and objective,” Kirsch said of his method.
“You can calculate confidence bounds from the 4 numbers in the ratio using the normal methods.
“You can shift the observation start time and window size to show you that the result is robust.”
READ MORE – Renowned Oncologist: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Caused Deadliest Cancer Crisis in History
Slay News