Read and his colleagues vaccinated 100 chickens, leaving 100 others unvaccinated.

They then infected all the birds with strains of Marek’s that varied in how virulent — as in how dangerous and infectious — they were. The team found that, over the course of their lives, the

“unvaccinated birds shed far more of the least virulent strains”

into the environment, whereas

“the vaccinated birds shed far more of the most virulent strains”.

The findings suggest that the

“Marek’s vaccine encourages more dangerous viruses to proliferate”

This increased virulence might then give the viruses the means to overcome birds’ vaccine-primed immune responses and sicken vaccinated flocks.

quantamagazine.***

Me: So vaccines potentially could cause more dangerous viruses to proliferate through shedding, through the bodies skin and by reprogramming the virus in the head, so that more dangerous viruses are injected into the air by sneezing, coughing, exhaling, talking, or just breathing – from the Covid disease in the body, by air breathing animals including humans, through cross infection, on this planet

But what about the virus itself, why not treat the virus before it becomes Covid the disease, or the needs to vaccinate, if potentially, that makes the overall situation worse?

After all that is what the above part of the research paper says.

So if we treated the Coronavirus and killed it in the air around us and in the head, before it became Covid in the body, then vaccines would be totally unnecessary and the money generated from their production, would immediately cease.

Does that make any sense to you?