11 hours
x
17 Views

RE: (there is a lot of already weirdly s***** pro circumcision content here already and it is obvious it is some fetish)

Being pro circumcision is not weird. It is not a fetish.

Those of you who insist on keeping the useless and excessive for.eskin are the ones with a fetish. The anti-circumcision campaign was started by homose.xuals who love to suc.k and chew on their g a y lovers foreskin. That IS a fetish. And a weird one!

The g a y s want to impose their weird chewing fetish on all boys. The g a y s want everyone to keep their for.eskin so they can engage in their weird foreskin suc.king and chewing ritual. Unfairly they want everyone to have a big floppy for.eskin and not be circumcised because they don’t know which boys will grow up to be gay fa.ggots and which boys will be normal. To promote their weird perversion, the gays want ALL boys to have a chewable for.eskin, just in case he grows up to be g a y. That’s certainly selfish of the g a y s to inflict their weird sickness on all of society.

One of the many lies and errors in the g a y anti-circumcision campaign is to compare the male pe.nis to the female va.gina. The two are not the same.

Understandably that comes as a shock to most fa.ggots because they have no knowledge of female anatomy. Instead the g a y s are intensely focused on their own pe.nis. They compare everything in the world to their pe.nis. Everything centers around the pe.nis and
g a y s.ex.

It is obvious that you are unaware that labia surgery and cli.toris hood surgery is already legal. The labia is not more excessive after puberty as you falsely claim. Many men prefer that women have labia and they have no desire for the labia cut off in revenge, as you do.

Your bizarre reference to pu.bic waxing is totally unrelated to the topic of male circumcision. As the
g a y s s o often do, you appear to be trying to confuse various topics to muddy the waters.

There is no reason to condemn male circumcision as you wish. The practice is utilized world wide and over thousands of years with many beneficial results. The pro circumcision posts here attest to the medical, psychological, aesthetic, health and mental benefits enjoyed by the circumcised boy. The benefits extend to his mother, sisters, his girlfriend, wife and to society as a whole. Hopefully we will see many more posts praising the virtues of male circumcision.

New Confession

Related Confessions

REPLY TO: ‘there is a lot of already weirdly pro circumcision content here already and…”

Circumcision should be mandatory by law for all boys, no exceptions. No exceptions at all, no excuses. Since we mandate vaccinations, we can also mandate circumcision.

The school nurse can verify that each boy has been properly pruned, clipped and snipped. A photo can be placed in his school records and verified yearly.

Doctors, nurses, and hospitals would have a mandatory duty and full authority to circumcise any co.ck they found that was not cut and trimmed or that needed to be tightened up.

All girls should be educated in middle school or high school about the necessity of male circumcision and the styles available so they can choose how much they want snipped off. I’d recommend the radical circumcision to the girls as the most desirable type of cut and trim. It removes all the foreskin, removes the frenulum and is nice and tight.

If the mother wishes, additional skin can be clipped from the shaft which will then pull the ball sac up the shaft, tightening the sac. The mother can do with the co.ck whatever she wishes. She owns it.

A circumcision must be thorough and complete. I hope that a law is passed requiring a thorough and comprehensive circumcision for each and every boy.

Boys should be fully circumcised before the age of 10. Certainly before they hit puberty around age 12. The mother can decide at what age she wants the boy to be pruned. She can also decide all other details and issues so as to give the boy the appropriate circumcision experience.